The Home - Part 1

The origin of the home was in the beauty of Eden.  It was there God first pronounced a problem with His creation, that the man was alone.  So God created Eve from the side of Adam, the marriage began, and the first home was established.  God’s plan from Eden onward is one man, one women, for one lifetime.  The recent past in our country witnessed an attack upon the home as God designed it.  One major battlefront is divorce.

As divorce became more acceptable and thus more prominent in the nation some questioned the effects upon the children.  “Experts” have said for years that children are flexible, they are adaptable to changing situations, and therefore divorce is not a big problem for children.  In fact, we were told, it is better for children to grow up in a single parent home rather than live in a two-parent home where there is constant conflict.  The research data is in and the results do not fit the picture so often painted.

Diane Medved cited research from a five year study conducted by Judith Wallerstein and Joan Berlin Kelly in her 1989 book The Case Against Divorce.  The argument for better childhood development in a happy single-parent home versus a troubled two-parent home was shown wrong.  Medved observed, “The two parent home is better for your child’s development.”  Write Wallerstein and Kelly,  ‘There is, in fact, no supporting evidence in this five-year study for the commonly made argument that divorce is overall better for children than an unhappy marriage” (page 242).  She went on to note the researcher’s conclusion, “that children develop better when their parents stay married (italics in original): ‘Unfortunately, it appears clearly that the divorced family is, in many ways, less adaptive economically, socially, and psychologically to the raising of children than two-parent families’” (Medved page 242, 243).

There is more recent research on the subject.  Cal Thomas wrote in a recent editorial about the results of a twenty-five year study conducted by Judith Wallerstein and Julia Lewis.  The study traced the results of divorce on 60 families which included 26 children aged 2 to 6 when the divorces occurred.  Thomas noted that the study showed “that far from just the initial impact on children, which fades with time, divorce is a cumulative experience that produces stark emotional scars and shapes the attitudes, behavior and relationships of children of divorce into adulthood.”

Some of the behaviors are summed up by Thomas: “Half of those studied became seriously involved with drugs and alcohol.  Many of the children, especially the girls, became sexually active early in adolescence.”  The children also developed negative attitudes toward marriage.  Thomas wrote, “Lewis noted that the long-lasting effects of their parents’ divorce caused adult children to become ‘very, very anxious about marriage (and ) fidelity.  They don’t trust their own picture of marriage,’ remembering ‘how unhappy one or both of their parents were (and) the infidelity, the depression and sadness.’”

Is it any wonder that “God hates divorce”?

—Denny